EXTRACT

New World Order Map

So much is being said nowadays about a “New World Order” which is to come, and which is to cure supposedly everything forever. It reminds you very much of the wonderful things the “New Deal” was to do, and supposedly did for this country and for the world. Of course, promises of crooked politicians — the New Deal and the Old Deal alike — are of less value than the proverbial “scrap of paper.” Only ignoramuses and fools take them seriously or at face value.

But, there is something new proposed in the way of promises. Just as last time we had a “war to end all wars” and a “war to save democracy”, so this time we have that and much more added. We are going to cure all evils in the world — once and forever. And do it in an altogether new way. How is this to be accomplished?  Why, by that well-advertised and most wonderful thing called a “New World Order”. And, pray, what is this to be?  That should not be too openly discussed nor too definitely described, lest too much of the world-planners’ plans be known and exposed before-time to the “common herd”, who is not supposed to be initiated into the “confidential plannings” made for them so generously and so magnanimously — BEHIND THE SCENES.

Of course, there are several supposedly different plans. These, however, if analyzed, are very much alike: They aim at a phantastic world-government and world-state. They use slogans (shibboleths) of liberty, freedom, democracy, brotherhood, security, and the like, very profusely — to cover the real purpose of the “planners”.

One such concrete scheme for the salvation of all mankind is that proposed in what is CALLED ‘THE POST-WAR NEW WORLD ORDER MAP“. This was published by Maurice Gomberg of Philadelphia. It should be good — inasmuch as it originated, supposedly, in the city of Brotherly Love. “Maurice” is American for “Moritz“.  Now Gomberg is not by any chance a refugee!?!  But, he does belong to the “persecuted race”. And Gomberg — he has some very peculiar ideas on freedom, including the “Four Freedoms”.  He put those ideas into the map, which he published. You might, after seeing that map, think that he, Gomberg, is crazy. But, I warn you, brother, do not be too hasty in your conclusions. Maybe it is not Gomberg’s idea at all. Maybe it is somebody else’s plan — somebody greater and more powerful than “little nobody” Gomberg. What would Charlie McCarthy be without Edgar Bergen behind him?  So, also, what would Gomberg be without the prophets and the planners who prompt him?  And, do not for a moment think that Moritz and his Bergens are not prophets. I’ll bet you 99 to 1 any time and stake my reputation on the bet that he is a prophet. Let us leave the proof, however, for later on. Instead, let us give a description of that mysterious map, to see how Moritz Gomberg and his Bergens want to cure all the world’s ills. It is priced at one dollar but giving a $1000 worth of information.

And, we want now to consider this matter seriously, laying all jest aside. It is a very, very serious affair. To understand the Gomberg Map, however, you must first understand that there IS actually a program for a world-government, world-state, or whatever other name they — the world-planners — want to give it. They do call it also “Federation of the World”, “World Republic”, “Commonwealth of Nations”, etc.  For decades this idea has been advocated in secret conclaves, secret organizations and in writings destined more or less for the initiated few. They dared not to come out with it into the open. Nonetheless they were planning and scheming, and that long before Hitler and Tojo. Lately this issue emerged into the forum of public discussion. It was forced out into the open. That is true notwithstanding the fact that circumstances partly contributed to and necessitated it. This forcing it out into the open has, however, gone far beyond the wishes of the “planners”. This map is one instance. They did not want the people to know their plans in full, lest knowledge of them spoil the SCHEMES FOR WORLD-DOMINATION. They had thought that they could “put it over” on the nations without them suspecting the real objectives, as they did in Russia with communism.

To their detriment and to our salvation enough people are aware of the “hellish conspiracy”, although there are still many unsuspecting and unwary, good and simple people; many “saps” also and “gullible fools” who fall for the well-financed propaganda.

To bring about this world-state, the “LEAGUE OF NATIONS” had been brought into existence. Its aim was to join forty, fifty or more nations into one big world-entity. But, the League of Nations met with much opposition in its birth, and later on. Much of the opposition was from people who knew what its purposes and objectives were. Not their motives, but the League’s and its promoters’, should be questioned and scrutinized. It will then be found that the League was intended as a STEP in this general direction — towards a world-government and world-state. It WAS. Instead of preventing wars, it served to foment them. It served the big powers instead of protecting the small ones; it rather multiplied troubles and intensified injustices than prevented them. “It played into the hands of Germany and Russia” — say those who know. It certainly connived with Germany’s re-armament, and with Russia’s scheme of world-revolution. Litvinoff, Russia’s present ambassador to the U.S.A., was one of its chairmen. There was opposition to it in many quarters, not in the U.S.A. alone. And very much of that opposition was amply justified. In fact, the whole scheme became discredited. The League stood helpless, and that not because of its lack of sanctions, but because of its lack of fundamental honesty of purpose and principle. In a word, the League did not function as intended. So, NOW there was need of a CHANGE IN PROGRAM. This change in the program came in due time. NICHOLAS MURRAY BUTLER, head of a great propaganda machine called “The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace”, in a speech in 1938 before the “Pilgrim Society”, of which he is president, intimated that change of program. On that occasion, after drinking a toast to the President of the

PAGE 5

United States and to the King of England, he said: “IT IS EASIER TO DRAW TOGETHER THREE OR FOUR COMPONENT PARTS of the world, than it is FIFTY OR SIXTY NATIONS.”

Preceding this statement, he is quoted also as having said at the Lord Cecil luncheon, Hotel Astor, November 19, 1937: “NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS MUST GO in the interest of World Government, World Police and World Currency.”

The Honorable Clare Hoffman of Michigan, speaking in the House of Representatives June 28, 1941, called attention to the fact that: “LORD HALIFAX here in Washington WAS AGREEABLE TO A ‘PHONEY WAR’ TO PERMIT GERMANY TO GOBBLE UP THE SMALLER NATIONS OF EUROPE; that England has no money with which to pay her past war debts, does not expect to pay them, nor does she expect to make any repayments on the lend-lease program.” (Lend-Lease and Reciprocal Trade agreements are all instruments of the International Bankers.)

Now Nicholas Murray Butler, President of Columbia University, is one of those who knows more about this plan than most people suspect. He could tell us much, very much more about it, if he only chose to speak. But what he said is sufficient — especially if you bring those various pieces of information together. As for Lord Halifax, — can there be any doubt whether he knew what he was saying?  One of the propaganda instruments for this international cabal, Frederick L. Schuman, Department of Government, Williams College, Williamstown, Mass., at a “Union Now” luncheon, in New York, on February 11, 1942, has in an unguarded moment let the secret out of the bag, when he confessed: “The first world war was for the League of Nations.  We lost it.  THIS WAR IS FOR WORLD GOVERNMENT. … If we do not PUT OVER A WORLD GOVERNMENT we will lose the peace.”  Who is “we”?  Not the people. Who then?  The “world planners” who through a completely centralized world-government would attain their goal — world domination. The fact therefore stands out: The plan as intended in the League of Nations was changed. Instead of trying to unite fifty or sixty nations together into a world-government, the “world-planners” want to consolidate certain parts of the world into one so that later on these three or four parts may be united together and form one gigantic world-state — with them, of course, on top. To bring this about they were willing to start another war with its attending evils (using even Hitler to do the dirty job) in order to “put over” a world-government or world-state. That is precisely the stage at which the Gomberg Map portrays the world to us — in the post-war period. That is why this map is so important. It lifts the veil from some of the schemes of the “world planners” — not all of them. It does not mean that they will succeed with their plans, but it does show their “goal”. As a matter of fact, they are meeting with serious difficulties in “putting it over” and they are beginning to fear the consequences of their rash ambitions for “world-domination”, aware that many have become informed concerning their plans.

Let us now proceed to examine this map. It will be better understood with the foregoing background clear to us. The following are the plans of the world-planners, as evidenced by the Gomberg Map:

The UNITED STATES, after the war, is to take over Canada, Mexico, Central America (including Panama), the West Indies, thousands of islands in the Pacific (including the Philippines, Celebes, Halmaheira Islands, Moluccas Islands), plus, in the Atlantic — Bermuda, Azores, Madeira, Canary, Cape Verde Islands, plus, strategic bases on the West Coast of Africa — Dakar and Freetown. All of these islands and bases supposedly to be “peace security” outposts and bases. WHOSE peace and security are these outposts and bases on the Western Coast of Africa supposed to guard?  You will understand when you see to whom Africa is “handed over”.  In the meantime, be patient and forbear.

South America is to be united into one country — the “UNITED STATES OF SOUTH AMERICA”. Of course, it would have been better if South America could now be forced under the benign “peace-security program” of the U.S.A.  The consolidation of the Western Hemisphere would already be a “fait accompli” (accomplished fact). That would make it so much easier and bring the “world-planners” so much nearer to their ultimate goal. One whole hemisphere would already be under their complete control. And what a heaven on earth would South America then have!  Then would there be perfect “hemispheric solidarity”.  Oh, certainly, never again would peace and security be endangered. It would flow in streams from Washington, D.C. to all the Western Hemisphere. Just imagine!  Canada and South America would be secure and happy in spite of themselves. We would force them to be happy under our “beneficent protection”. Some wicked people might call that domination or imperialism; but we, of course, have no such intentions!?!  Our intentions are most honorable, beyond any possible doubt!?!  We seek their welfare and happiness!?!  And, if necessary, we will CRAM IT DOWN THEIR THROATS … just as we did here on the home front when we crammed down the throats of the people the same dirty, rotten “Old Deal” (of a dishonest money-system; exploitation; excessive taxation; confiscation of farms, homes, businesses; bureaucracy, etc.) by giving it a nice, new label and calling it — a “NEW DEAL”.  Many “saps” are still not wise to the fact.

Somehow or other, however, those South American Republics are suspicious, or know too much, and will not accept these plans “ready-made” for them. They object — strongly. They prefer to remain independent. Not to force too much the “hemispheric solidarity”, the “world planners” are offering them the plan of consolidation into the “United States of South America”, as explained. After all, this is a step forward in the general direction, isn’t it?  In the meantime, by the so-called Inter-American Bank, already in operation for several years, the Export-Import Bank, also in operation for several years, by Reciprocal Trade Treaties, by briberies with Lend-Lease “give-away” material paid for by American taxpayers (bribes offered Martinique and Argentina being the latest of many examples), and by many other means of financial strangling, we — or rather, the “world-planners” — will “gently, but firmly and irresistibly” bring them under our “protection”. We shall … literally “chloroform” them into sleep with our wonderful “Good Neighbor Policy”. That thing is such an

PAGE 6

ideal “soporific”, even though some of them do not trust it and refuse to be put to sleep.

The so-called “UNITED STATES OF EUROPE” is not a new idea at all. It goes back in the literature of “world-planners” for some two centuries or more. From time to time it popped up anew. It is very significant that it was discussed in 1929. One need recall an article by Rafael de Nogales, entitled “Europe Warned to Unite or Fall”, and published on September 15, 1929, in the New York World. From this we quote:  “On September 9 (1929) PREMIER ARISTIDE BRIAND proposed before the Assembly of the LEAGUE OF NATIONS at Geneva the formation of a United States of Europe which he declared was not now an impossibility. His proposal was favorably commented upon by Dr. Gustave Streseman, German Foreign Minister, and Arthur Henderson, British Foreign Secretary.”

According to the original plan, the United States of Europe was to include all the small countries of Continental Europe. It seems that this is no longer necessary in the interests of the “world-planners” — or rather, the … already existing secret world-government. They can discard the mask now, at least partly. Their power has grown to such proportions and has clutched more territory in their claws. Accordingly, the U.S. of Europe will comprise only what is left of Europe after the rest had been “gobbled up” by another “friendly democracy” for the purpose of peace and security, namely:  Portugal, Spain, France, Switzerland (no longer necessary as “a neutral front”?), Belgium, Luxemburg, Netherlands, Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily and Italy.

Norway, Denmark, Sweden, and the Spitsbergen Islands will constitute the “UNITED STATES OF SCANDINAVIA”.

The name of “ARABIAN FEDERATED REPUBLICS” will apply to Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Hejas, Yemen, Aden and Oman. After all — so it seems the planners think — what difference does it make to us?

The “FEDERATED REPUBLICS OF INDIA” will include India proper, Afghanistan, Nepal, Baluchistan, Bhutan, and Burma.

The “UNITED REPUBLIC OF CHINA” will cover China, Inner Mongolia, Tibet, Thailand, Malaya, Indo-China and Korea.

The “FEDERATED REPUBLICS OF GREECE” will take in Greece, Macedonia, Albania, Crete, Dodecanese and adjacent islands.

Turkey will, by condescension of the “world-planners”, remain “independent”.  One little exception:  European Turkey, adjacent to the Dardanelles, sea of Marmora and Bosporus, for considerations of “realistic peace strategy” (no mention of whose peace and whose strategy), shall be placed under control of the U.S.S.R. and Turkey. Turkey, of course, cannot be trusted with “peace strategy”; but, the U.S.S.R. can.

Eire, by their condescending goodness, will include not only present Eire but also Northern Ireland.

The little country of “Hebrewland” would include, not only Palestine, but also Trans-Jordan and adjacent regions, and would also be “independent”.

The whole continent of Africa would be consolidated into the “UNION OF AFRICAN REPUBLICS”.  That would make for unity!?!  That is a necessary step to insure peace and safety!?!  That is why around the continent there are to be established “peace-security bases”.  Two on the West Coast are blue (U.S.A.); the rest are red (British)!

Next comes the “British Commonwealth of Nations”.  One is actually astounded to find how little Britain is to receive of the spoils of war. Why, she loses Canada and the Guianas. She gives up India and some other minor territories. Or does she, inasmuch as her “banksters” control India financially?  She does retain besides the British Isles (England and Scotland).  Australia, New Zealand, Tasmania, with adjacent islands. To her go New Guinea (not half a slice, but the whole), Flores Islands, Borneo, Java, Sumatra, Ceylon (about 200,000 square miles rich in natural resources).  That gives her a slice of the defunct Netherlands Empire — defunct under British “protection”.  Britain also gets Madagascar (228,000 square miles).  This, if you recall, belonged to the French.  But, of course, the French empire will now be defunct also. The “world planners” think — or rather, know — it will be better for “peace and security”.  After all, that is only a slight matter — one empire, or two, or three or ten less, provided it is not the empires with “peaceful intentions”, and that, of course, means Britain in the first place. Madagascar is to go to Britain. And Madagascar by all rights of justice belongs to France. The peculiar thing about this matter is that the Gomberg Map was copyrighted March 31, 1942 — and exactly six weeks AFTER that, the British took Madagascar for “strategic reasons”.  Six weeks—exactly. Does that look as if Moritz Gomberg or his Bergens did not know anything about it?

Who will ever dare to question the prophetic vision of the new prophet of Israel?  And that is not the only prophecy contained in that map, as you will see. What wonderful “clairvoyants” those “world-planners” are. They can predict almost anything. Is it because they do the “planning”?  Well, maybe we could too, if we did the “planning”.  But I often wonder where do Pearson and Allen get all their predictions?  And where does the First Lady get hers?  And how does Newsweek, with its “Periscope”, get its predictions — four out of five being correct?  And above all, where does Walter Winchell (by some called “Vulture Vinchell”, because of his unusual appetite) get his “Flashes” and predict the future so often?  That SUPER-SMEARMASTER smashes more reputations of patriotic Americans than any of their mouthpieces, but never touches the real traitors, the alien-internationalist wrecking crew now hard at work — the “world-planners”. Is he “on the inside”?  Are all these “on the inside” of the “World-planners’ Council” or just their “Charlie McCarthys”?

Coming back to Britain, you still wonder how she gets so little of the spoils of war — this time. Thus far she always came out with more territory after every war. This time — what has happened?  Friend!  Don’t wonder, but use your brains as well as your eyes. You will discover the “joker in the deck”. Not only is Britain compensated by certain territories already mentioned (and those are territories rich in natural resources, taken from the French and Dutch), but also — note the innocent language — she “shall retain and acquire control of such territories, peace-security bases, and strategic

PAGE 7

island outposts essential for the maintenance of world peace and freedom of the seas.”  That includes the small item “of the continent of Africa (11,515,000 square miles), with its vast inexhaustible riches.  Not a bad trade for Canada (3,729,665 square miles, more than half of which is uninhabitable).  That is why those strategic bases are placed around Africa, one in Spain, and with U.S.A. guarding the West Coast for her!!!  U.S.A. to hold Dakar (ours by spoliation of France), and Freetown; and the Azores, etc. (ours by spoliation of Portugal and Spain).  That means in plain language that Britain is to “gobble up” the whole, immensely rich continent of Africa, and we are going to help her retain those spoils of war.  That will eliminate completely the French, Dutch, Portuguese, Italian, Spanish and Belgian possessions or empires.  All this — in favor of Britain. That is ONE “JOKER IN THE DECK”!

And now ANOTHER “JOKER”. Nothing so far has been said about Russia or rather the “Union of Soviet Socialist Republics“.  She, too, is a “democracy”.  She too is fighting for “freedom”, or rather for the “Four Freedoms”.  And Moritz Gomberg makes that clear, because he bases all his explanations on the speech of our “Great President” on the “Four Freedoms”.  How wonderful to have such champions of liberty in these days!  Russia and the wonderful Stalin are making such a gallant fight for “freedom” and “democracy”.  It is truly admirable. The trifles of past history that Russia murdered 20-40 million Christians; that she liquidated all who might have served as opposition-leaders; that she has been planning revolution in every country and promoting unrest and chaos in the U.S.A. and elsewhere; that she once “stabbed Poland in the back” whilst Hitler stabbed her in the front; that she is holding and starving a million and a half Polish children, mostly orphans (not to mention others); that she murdered cold-bloodedly 10,000 Polish officers, a fact she is trying to hide by-refusing an honest investigation by impartial judges — all these are eclipsed by her “present heroic fight for freedom and democracy”, things she does not have nor allow within her own boundaries, nor to her own people … notwithstanding all the nice, sugar-coated and well-financed propaganda (“Mission to Moscow” etc.) to the contrary.

Russia, which already has 8-1/4 million square miles, one-sixth of the earth’s surface for 180,000,000 population, will take a part from China, which has only 4-1/4 million square miles (one-half of Russia’s area) for a 450,000,000 population. She will also take a part from India, which has only 1.8 million square miles (one-quarter Russia’s area), for her 353,000,000 inhabitants, — Russia is scheduled to “gobble up” most of Europe, namely: Finland, Esthonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Roumania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Hungary, Czecho-Slovakia, Austria and Germany — a small matter of nearly one million square miles. All these countries are to constitute Soviet Socialist Republics, incorporated into the US.S.R. Not a small slice to take at once. All this is to be done in the name of the “Four Freedoms”, in the name of “peace, security and democracy”.

Now, after giving a detailed description, let us return to the general aspects of that “planned” map.  Certain things become clear to us as we analyze the “plans”.  There is a THIRD “JOKER”.  Namely:  THREE POWERS, three only, have anything to GAIN FROM THE NEW “CARVING”.  They are: U.S.A., Britain and Soviet Russia. Most of the others lose their sovereignty and independence. The few that do not, can not last long in their independence, aside from those three political giants. Sooner or later they will have to succumb to one of these three, and also be liquidated as a political entity absorbed into one of the three. Should any one still doubt such an evident conclusion, he needs to consider further proposals as they are “planned”.

At this time, precisely there is need to state that there is still a FOURTH “JOKER”.  That is this one; The three powers, the ONLY THREE POWERS which will be MILITARIZED, will be the selfsame three which get the lion’s share of the spoils:  the U.S.A., Britain and Soviet Russia. These three will have an army and navy; armaments, armament factories, etc. These — and these alone — can wage war and enforce their demands upon others, no matter what these demands may be in the future, no matter how unjust they may turn out to be. All of the other states — all, without a single exception — will be “de-militarized” independent (?) republics.  No army, no navy, no armaments. In plain terms:  they will be at the mercy and under the domination of the three gigantic bullies, who could forever afterward carry the chip on their shoulders. How long will their “independence”!?!  last in those circumstances, is a matter not hard to conjecture, unless you be a moron unable to think at all.

Besides establishing the freedoms, the “New World Order” will make various economic changes, such as the following:

Nationalization of all natural resources everywhere in the world. The purpose of this is “equitable distribution” to all nations. Maybe!?!  What can other nations do about it if it is less equitable then than it is now, when the imperial nations (including Britain and Soviet Russia) exclude others from the distribution, and thus furnish causes for wars?  Will injustice disappear then from the earth? Will Britain and Russia become angels — to share what they have?

“Nationalization” — that means socialism pure and simple. It means Russianization or Sovietization of the world. Is that an improvement?  Not if you judge by the facts. Nationalization of banking, foreign investments, railroads and power plants. This — also everywhere in the world. Nationalization of all armament and armament factories. Federal control of commerce and shipping. All this imitates Soviet Russia very closely and even slavishly. All that is lacking is the name — Sovietization! To top it all and put the financial control on the world, a world common monetary system is to be imposed. Our Secretary of the Treasury, Morgenthau (one of the world-planners?) has already advocated just that. That will complete the subjugation of the inhabitants of the world to the “world-planners”, who under the guise of freedom, peace, security and democracy are forging chains of slavery for the world so that they can then exploit them with impunity.

The final stage — the consolidation of the several — three or four — parts of the world into one gigantic super-state, with the “world-planners” and

PAGE 8

slave-driving exploiters on top, would be a comparatively easy process. The goal would be attained: one world-republic, one world-government, one world-federation, one world-state, one world-dictatorship.

How well that would promote the scheme of things against which Pope Benedict XV warned in his Motu Proprio, “Bonum sane” of July 25th, 1920, after the last war, when these sinister plans of long standing were being advocated:

“The advent of a universal republic which is LONGED FOR BY ALL THE WORST ELEMENTS OF DISORDER and confidently expected by them, is an idea that is now ripe for execution. From this republic, based on the principles of ABSOLUTE EQUALITY OF MEN AND COMMUNITY OF POSSESSIONS, would be banished ALL NATIONAL DISTINCTIONS, nor in it would the authority of the father over his children or of the public power over citizens, or of God over society, be any longer acknowledged. If these ideas are put into practice, there will inevitably follow A REIGN OF UNHEARD-OF-TERROR”. Shall we heed that warning, or shall we fall into the trap set for us by WORLD-CONSPIRATORS?

* * *

Recent developments apparently confirm the Gomberg map:  (a) Russia said:  “Hands off the Balkans!”  She wants certain countries in Central Europe!!  (b) EFE, Spanish newsagency, in Stockholm dispatch (12/30/1942) said, “Folkets Dagblad”, socialist newspaper, reported a treaty on May 26, 1942, between Great Britain and Soviets.  Terms: Russia to get political and military control over Finland, Germany, Hungary, Rumania, Bulgaria; bases in other (?) countries; passages from Baltic to North Sea, Black Sea to Mediterranean. Secret diplomacy?  (c) Moscow, through “National Committee of Free Germany” (Erich Weinert, Chrm.) asks Germany to revolt against Hitler, offers separate peace and “equal footing with other nations” (as Soviet Republics?)  That means:  Communist domination for Germany; double-cross for Allies; encirclement and end of Four Freedoms for others.

Norman Thomas, socialist, commented: Stalin “intends to call the tune” in Germany and Central Europe; “he is not going to permit a British-American army to police Germany after the war. He’s in a position to block it.”

What about it, Christian leaders?  Will you still blindly refuse to recognize the evil forces at work — at home and abroad?  Wake up!  IT IS LATER THAN YOU THINK!  WATCH AND PRAY!

– 30 –